The use and abuse of words is an endlessly fascinating subject to anyone interested in communications. We are pleased to introduce the following guest column by Unspeak author Steven Poole:
A few years ago, a friend of mine who was working in PR used the phrase "thought leaders" in conversation. What an excellent name, I thought, picturing influential thinkers. Edward O Wilson? Ray Kurzweil? Peter Singer? Vaclav Havel? What fun to call them "thought leaders". But then my friend confessed that what she meant by "thought leaders" was, er, style journalists. I was piqued by the idea that the tasks style journalists perform might constitute "thought", and that among them could be a rank of heroic "leaders", leaders who lead more than the people who actually design and cut the dresses and shoes.
Unpacking the hidden arguments behind such language is the task I set myself in my new book, Unspeak. Have you ever noticed how the term "human resources" for personnel departments implies that humans exist to be used up and replaced when no longer useful? Did you know that the oil and coal industries successfully lobbied to change the official language of "global warming" to "climate change", because the latter sounds less frightening? Were you aware that the war on Iraq was initially dubbed Operation Iraqi Liberation, before someone noticed that this spells OIL?
PR companies were involved in much of this disinformation. Now, I don't mean to denounce PR in general. The people who work on publicity for my book, for instance, are beautiful and wise. But PR exists in a grey area between advertising, whose claims we know to take with a mountain of salt, and official communications, supposedly true. The very name, "public relations", is interesting. I am all for relations among the public. It is fun to see couples kissing in the street, or, as Louis Armstrong said, to see men shaking hands, saying "How do you do?". But "public relations" implies a friendly, two-way communication between the client and the public, when what really goes on is often a one-way massaging of the truth. Compare the American notion of "public diplomacy". Again, diplomacy implies an equal exchange of ideas culminating in friendly agreement. But "public diplomacy" is actually propaganda.
A few days ago, three prisoners in Guantanamo Bay hanged themselves, an action described by the base commander as "an act of asymmetrical warfare". Soon enough, a member of the administration weighed in, calling the suicides "a good PR move to draw attention". The person who said this was the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy. This kind of thing, you will notice sadly, gives PR an even worse reputation than it already has.
So could PR operate without deceptive language, without Unspeak, at all? I'd like to see it try. I submit that the decent people who work in public relations need to think seriously about how to distance their discipline from the kind of aggressively manipulative rhetoric that, in the political sphere, makes light of death, war and torture. If they manage that, they might really be "thought leaders".
Unspeak is a must read for anyone in the PR business or anyone considering the profession. For most information, see http://unspeak.net .
A top US official has described the suicides of three detainees at the US base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as a "good PR move to draw attention". Speaking to the BBC's Newshour programme, Colleen Graffy, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy, said the deaths were part of a strategy and "a tactic to further the jihadi cause, but taking their own lives was unnecessary."
Detainees had access to lawyers, received mail and had the ability to write to families, so had other means of making protests, she said.
The men, two Saudis and a Yemeni, were found dead by guards on Saturday morning.
There have been dozens of suicide attempts since the camp was set up four years ago but none successful until now.
Ken Roth, head of Human Rights Watch in New York, told the BBC the men had probably been driven by despair.
As an accredited PR practitioner with more than 15 years experience in the industry, I take strong exception to the association. But I can understand the confusion. It is a known fact that of the more than 40,000 people working in PR today, most if not all are desperate and think about suicide regularly.
# # #
ARTICLE UPDATE 6-12
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack today said, "I would not say that the suicides were a PR stunt."
On Thursday, March 8, 2007 at 7:41 AM, Ronn Torossian, President and CEO of 5WPR, emphatically promised that he was going to sue us. No real reason, he was just irritated by our teasing him about getting in bed with pornographer Joe Francis. Anyway, Ronn gave his obscenity-laced word that we'd see the complaint in 72 hours. It's now late by
Kathleen Durazo about A Measly $2.8 Million Goes Missing, Lawsuit Results Fri, Jul 31, 10:58:34 AM Ray Durazo (the founder) sold the company to Dan in 1999. He was not involved in any of this. He (and I) found out about the lawsuit in the LA Times. In addition to embezzling this m [...]