Are PR consultancies teetering on extinction? by David GallagherComments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I applaud the exercise and agree with its premise. Any chance we can actually get a look-see at the survey questions? Would be a more efficient way to add a voice to the debate.
There's actually only one question: what will the successful agency of the future look like? As I said, not that scientific, but nothing like an open-ended question to get the conversation going.
David, I appreciate your commentary, and your exciting view of the PR consultancy of the future. It is quite informative to learn from such an experienced executive as you, and to have you expound on such an intriguing topic.
As a PR pracititioner who has spent a considerable portion of his career working in large international firms such as Ketchum, I am curious to learn, perhaps in a future guest column, about how Ketchum is currently wrestling with these changing industry dynamics, and how it is developing a cohesive strategy to transform itself from its current state to the future agency you describe above. In other words, how do you intend to get from Point A (now) to Point B (the future)?
Thanks, Keith. Globally, I suppose we wrestle with these issues every day, both on behalf of our clients and to deliver value to the shareholders at Omnicom, our holding company. And if I'm honest, I'd say we're making more progress in some areas than others.
In the UK, where a little over half our business is "international" -- i.e, not just concerned with the UK market -- we're facing these issues more acutely. One area of focused response for us is in the area "versatility" -- bringing specialized industry and functional communications service to clients without getting twisted up in our own organizational knickers. So we're a lot less about departments or practices or "specialisms" and a lot more about forming fluid teams of highly specialized professionals to meet each engagement's unique needs. Again, our success is variable, but promising.
I have to say I'm curious: what do you mean by fluid teams? that they come together for a specific engagement and then disband to reform around other engagements? Do they work on more than one client engagement at a time? How many? Does your office flat-rate bill or do tiered-billing -->in other words, if i were a client I'd want to know what the ratio is between svp/vp, vs ae/aae? How is this versatile account team setup (around the engagement) different than the way Ketchum has always done (or said it has done) things? When did it change? What does a typical team look like? Don't get me wrong: I think the UK is far ahead of the corporate seat, but just HOW you unknot the nickers while keeping your billings up is still unclear to this ex-ketchumite. Thanks for continuing the discussion.
Sorry for the dead air, Jeneane, but I hope you'll appreciate it's a lot later in my day, and it's a holiday (here) to boot ... you raise some good questions, and I'm not sure we're any closer to answering them now than when you left the agency. I think the key has to be in worrying less about billings and more about results, which is far easier said than done, I know. Again, I'm not saying my agency has a lock on this -- just saying that most folks I've spoken to agree that the successful agency of the future will. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Thank you for your late-night reply, David. You're a class act. And that's a fact.
I'm asking these questions not to be a jerk (some would disagree), or because I have an axe to grind with Ketchum (it's actually a Napoleonic Era sword), but because I really don't see HOW the business models and processes of BigPR Cos CAN adapt to -- or even if they can, whether they can adapt in time. What's more, why should they? I see what you are describing as some "future-state agency" as current-state. It's happening right now. You Say: "Services will be highly collaborative, literally co-operating with audiences, rather than merely speaking at them. And audiences themselves will be seen more as communities -- dynamic, powerful collections of economic, creative and intellectual resource. Importantly, services of the successful agency will stress credibility and transparency, whether in mainstream or consumer produced media. Competition for "content" services will be fierce, and involve an array of contenders: ad agencies, 'digital' agencies and IT consultants, not to mention millions -- potentially billions -- of every day people who are now producing their very own content every single day." Forget the "will" -- it's here. Been here. It's the net. We've been talking all along -- even some of us within long-standing agencies -- while the agencies as corporations and subsidiaries have been mired in "there." So you see, I don't think the Big Agencies need to adapt and become nimble or "Glocal." On the contrary. I think that they should continue to message toward, and focus on, serving a highly specific kind of customer -- the large global enterprise -- which is the best-fit customer for global PR firms. It's a win-win. You let the independents and small, nimble firms of collected talent handle the social media stuff for mid-size organizations and down (globally as collected knowledge-and-execution hubs via the net and locally as HIGHLY regional specialists). And we let the global Interpublic and Omnicom owned brands (plus Edelman) continue to be agencies of record for The Big Enterprises worldwide. As long as those big enterprises stay healthy, you stay healthy. As long as you continue to train and then repel talented folks back into the market, we stay healthy. Then, you spend your resources competing against one another; we spend our resources collaborating with one another, and EVERYBODY WINS!! HAPPY HAPPY JOY JOY? Okay, I'll have an agreement reflecting these details faxed to you on Monday. I'll sign if you will. ;-)
my kingdom for a line break. (really, when i typed it in i took actual breaths between some sentences.) I guess we should use HTML? Here's a test.
If this is a new paragraph, then yes, we should.
Hi Jeneane,
I am Amanda's webmaster. Let me help you. Strumpette is on the Serendipity blog engine. According to the lead developer Garvin Hicking, "Comments can never contain HTML code. Serendipity strips them out completely, as HTML in comments is the worst thing to do in any open Wiki or Blog system as every user can put dangerous javascript into your blog and steal login cookies or do other nasty things." I have enabled line breaks for your convenience. Sorry for the oversight. I hope that helps. Regards, Brian
I agree with a lot of what you've written, Jeneane, especially the idea that the future arrives faster for some than others. I guess in some ways I'm trying the nudge the big boys further along the space-time continuum a little faster than they may have moved themselves. And in other ways I'm saying the lines between the big agencies and the smaller must and will blur (indeed, are blurred now).
Add Comment
|
It is my distinct pleasure to introduce a guest column today by J. David Gallagher, Partner/CEO, Ketchum London. In it he discusses "the dramatic world-flattening changes happening in business, media and culture and how the vast majority of agencies remain mired in antiquated outlooks and structures. Some are adjusting to the shifting landscape, but many others have yet to register the changes happening all around them. Who will thrive, and who will not?"
About Ketchum
There is an interesting post today at Strumpette by David Gallagher - Partner/CEO Ketchum London that poses the question - What does a successful PR agency of the future look like? The preliminary conclusions as they relate to the marketplace
Tracked: Apr 13, 15:57
You know it is a beautifully executed guest column in Public Relations when Ketchum is mentioned 17 times, integrity is mentioned twice and ethical gets the nod at one. Ethical being tied with asses kicked which also scored a one. Outbound links? Zero (0). So much for strategy in PR. WFT? Here are just the headings from the guest PR article - again with zero links. A Global Survey of the PR Business PR Agencies of the Future Glocalization Versatility Diversity Value and Results Collaboration, Community and Credibility Leadership Preliminary Conclusions About Ketchum About David Gallagher Pardon my disaffected tone, but how can you mention Glocalization without mentioning G/Localization? Just to push the point, here are a few more PR keyword counts: blogs = 0, but weblogs = 1 consumer produced media= 1 but consumer generated media = 0 (be a rebel) David Gallagher shows up 6 times. video stuff? 0. Nuf said. This is a column called Are PR consultancies teetering on extinction? right? I admit I have been in geek mode the last few days but still, exactness of speech is exactness of speech, right? You must be able to communicate with relevant terms or your strategy will fail. Or perhaps a better way of expressing the same thing is you can't formulate strategy without understanding the landscape truly and deeply. The overall content of the article IS relevant. My dis, if you can call it that, will go unrequited because the author already said:The opportunities of a "glocal" market will reward the agencies that can most adroitly and consistently bring their specialist expertise to the fore. The number of agencies capable of doing this now is approximately zero.and this hopeful statement:We'll also see agencies with people who can help us understand how audiences interpret, process and act on the information, including cultural anthropologists, psychologists, and potentially even people of faith and spiritual backgrounds.Many have long said quotas are stupid, but that diversity is radically important for completely selfish reasons; a diverse staff is more freakin' profitable! I like reading that others see the importance of diversity and cultural anthropology. The agency of the future will evolve beyond antiquated remuneration systems, and earn income on the bases of expertise, efficiency and results. They will offer value in ideas, creativity and strategy in ways the client simply cannot develop on their own, and this expertise will be charged on consultancy rates, at a premium. The implementation of ideas, using a combination of agency resources, client capabilities and free-lancers and consultants, will ensure the best execution at the best price. And the great agencies will identify targets -- hard commercial objectives -- with clients and agree a reward system to share in the effectiveness of activities. So while I definitely find fault with the blog-ability of the author, he does appear to have potential to understand. Perhaps the next time Amanda can ghost link like Mr. Lutz? And ghost edit. Or just write it. Or run training workshops. Wow,
Tracked: Apr 14, 00:52