This is an open letter to: Constantin Basturea, Richard Becker, Todd Defren, Mike Driehorst, Eric Eggertson, Rick Murray, Robert French, Susan Getgood, Chris Heuer, Peter Himler, Neville Hobson, Kami Huyse, Shel Israel, Joe Jaffe, Jeff Livingston, Brian Oberkirch, B.L. Ochman, Jeremy Pepper, Steve Rubel, Robert Scoble, and least but not last, Phil Gomes.
On behalf of everyone here, we’d like to say we’re sorry.
We’ve been AWFULLY hard on you folks. For over a year now we’ve characterized you as a band of self-important nincompoops and, well, snake-oil salesmen. Turns out, our negative characterization may have been misguided. Certain information has been brought to our attention that now throws our conclusions into question.
First, for the record, here's what we were thinking: Throughout the 19th century salesmen/showmen roamed the U.S., going from town to town, peddling “cures to what ailed ya.” As depicted in Western folklore, a hawker would set up stage and boast the efficacy of his particular elixir. This was typically aided by a shill in the audience who would, at the appropriate moment, call out that it had cured his particular ailments. Later, after the unsuspecting public had purchased all the con artists' product, both would quickly "light out" of the area before the townspeople discovered the worthlessness of their claims. This is how “snake oil” became synonymous with fraud. Today, as you are aware, it still refers to something worthless and fake.
Well, turns out that’s incorrect. In a series of scientific papers, the most recent published in the Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism, Nobuya Shirai, a top scientist at the Japanese National Food Research Institute, evaluated the effects of Erabu sea-snake oil on mice. The focus was primarily on maze-learning ability, as well as endurance swimming. Surprisingly, in both cases, snake oil significantly improved the ability of the lab mice, especially in comparison with those that had been fed lard.
According to a recent article in Scientific American, "Snake-Oil Salesmen Were on to Something,” “Despite Shirai’s analysis, snake oil retains its fraudulent feel in the U.S., perhaps because the Japanese research is not widely known.” The article concludes, “Of course, most 19th century snake oil salesmen did not, in fact, sell sea-snake oil. Even those hucksters who did sell actual snake oil would likely have sold the rattlesnake variety, nearly useless for any medicinal purpose.”
That said, again, we’d like to fain our sincerest apologies to the PR 2.0 Club. Of course, this is a blanket statement. We are certainly aware that some of you are heavily into promoting both lard and rattlesnake oil. But actually, no matter: PRs, especially Web 2.0 experts, are not really known for their maze-learning ability or endurance swimming.
Okay? We cool?
Kind regards,
Mark Abrams
Senior Editor
I don't carry advertising on Imagethief as a matter of principle. And, of course, because no one will
Tracked: Nov 29, 01:03