Another Shoe Drops; FCC Issues More Fines for VNRsTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Fines for misleading VNRs -- I applaud the intent, but is $16,000 much of a deterrent for a multi billion dollar company? Though I suppose the fine does scuff their image.
Do you see a difference in a VNR and a news release? If so, then applaud the FCC's decision and CMD's fight.
I don't see a difference, so I think the issue is an insult to TV journalists. They're trained to decipher legit, viewer-interested news (even if from a VNR) from junk. Just like print and other professional journalists are trained to decipher legit news ideas and news releases from crappy story pitches and news releases. But, do print journalists disclose the source or idea for a story? No. So, why should TV journalists disclose the source of their stories? If the VNRs and other stories TV stations choose to air is crap, their viewership will drop. -- Mike Add Comment
|
The Federal Communications Commission yesterday announced four more fines for video news releases (VNRs) aired without disclosure. The fines totaling $16,000 have been levied against the Comcast cable company.