WARNING: Beware the Dark Side of PR 2.0Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
A lot of this is being done in Russian PR, where Black PR has a long, rich history - intertwined with good, old fashioned, government propaganda. That and the mass of hacker expertise there makes all this really relevant.
Otherwise, how does a consultant go about pitching Black PR and Black PR 2.0 to a client? I work out of London and that might be something genuinely new!
Mmm. This may be the biggest load of tosh I've seen online since the last one, or it could just be a huge wind-up.
Let's take just one little sliver. "One of the leading European airlines (name withheld here for security) recently launched a new version of its website. It's Ajax Web2.0 orientated; it's beautiful; and it's vulnerable. What happened? The airline's major competitor hired a small team of professional "black-hats" (hackers) to probe the site using light-weigh Web-apps. The hackers directly found various "leaks," allowing them glean the names, contact details and many other personal data of the competitor's customers. The competing airline used the information to target specific travel prospectives and prices. The result: the company with the beautiful new website lost about 25 percent the annual revenue as a result of client conversion." Bzzzt! Does not compute! Really, a quarter of a major European airline's revenue went away because someone hacked their website and then used the information to target customers? There's really no easier way to find an airline's customers? And this enormous circus of fraud and incompetence happened and nobody got arrested? And 'light weigh[t] Web-apps" have been the weapons of choice among hackers since... when? I do not think these words mean what you think they mean. R
well, check out the current Skype outage. ALEXA clearly shows that Skype has list a significant portion of their traffic for the duration. What if this was caused by hackers?
Since you don't mention the name of the hacked airline, it's hard to verify your case study. After losing 25% of revenues, surely a "leading European airline" would address this issue? If it is no longer an issue, surely it's safe to mention their name?
If they are a client, it's imperative, of course that you not name them - but in this case, I believe that you should identify them as a client of yours. If not, I think that you should feel free to tell us who they are, in order that we can draw more informed conclusions. Isn't this just a "tidy up your Web 2 leaks" security story (like the three little pigs)? But one that's been beefed up, and made scarier by your slightly vague, doom-laden prophecies. Could we really lose 25% of our revenues if a competitor grabbed my customer list? It feels wrong somehow - I've never known customers to be either so fickle, or so responsive to messaging. And from what little I recall of another airlines (publicly recorded) "dirty tricks" campaign in the early nineties, this seems like a gross inflation. An interesting artlcle, though, and one that demands close attention.
Hi - very nice writeup. I didn't know Paterva - cool hint, thx. The black-linking to decrease site ranks is a pretty common technique in good ol' since the BMW 'accident' :)
This post brings up a lot of good food for thought although most of the band wagoners won't take heed until its far too late.
Add Comment
|
Have you seen a sudden increase in the interest in "Black PR"? If you haven't... you will.