The PR Gospel According to Phil: LESSON 03-02-07Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Yes... but within reason Phil.
There are two things that drive me crazy with regard to self promotion. Our brethren who abuse frequency and our brethren that abuse content. Both happen A LOT! People like Maggie Chamberlin Holben (who we've written about here) sending out press releases about being profiled by a trade magazine. Cut me a break. From her release: "Holben connected with editor, Marcia Duffy, through PR Newswire’s Profnet system via the query entitled, 'Successful Home Businesses.' Duffy was looking for successful home-business owners to interview for a column called 'Home Office Weekly Profiles.'" Good for Mags. But to then blast out a press release about a mere column item is just plain ridiculous. Then there are folks like Kami Huyse, Constantin Basturea and Scott Baradell teaming up for a PRSA teleseminar titled “Social Media Update: Legal Implications.” Again, cut me a break! These lightweight blog evangelists and PR club boosters don't know the legal implications of a parking ticket let alone the intricacies of corporate and communications law and the risks involved. I asked Kami about it and she responded that her husband had a PhD in risk. Of course, tangential expertise transferred by injection is okay for cocktail party chit chat but a professional teleseminar? The sad part is in both these examples, the practitioners do not know that that are misbehaving or totally out of their league. They're just "Happily and Shamelessly Promoting Themselves." Does that average PR know the difference? I'm not so sure sadly. - Amanda
Hi Amanda
Ah, but I said "shamelessly" -- not "stupidly"! I don't see these examples as falling into my concept of self-promotion. That's simply showing off to other PR practitioners and the PR rags. My pal Mike Paul does that a lot, too, especially when he gets a guest gig on Fox News. I used my shamelessness to establish a reputation outside of the PR orbit -- those poor souls are going in the opposite direction. If I was profiled in a magazine, I never bragged about it to other PR people (let alone send out a press release to my peers). Instead, the coverage was incorporated into my company's portfolio, which was only shown when I was doing new business pitches. The only people who knew about such coverage were the prospective clients I was trying to pitch. The shameless aspect of the self-promotion came strictly to media outlets that could build my business and enhance my reputation (i.e., the world outside of the PR hemisphere). Such activities did not include any outreach to the illustrated toilet paper we know as PR trade journals. By the way, I love "tangential expertise transferred by injection." In honor of my national holiday, the March 1st celebration of St. David's Day, I recall a similar turn-of-phrase when Elizabeth Taylor (in her years as Mrs. Richard Burton) was bleeped off the BBC by defining herself as "Welsh by osmosis."
Amanda, let's play fair.
I Googled the teleseminar in question, and it's being offered by PRSA. Here is the ground they will cover: • How do you set up a blog for a client and remain transparent? • How do you identify who you are/whom you represent? • What have we learned from the Wal-Mart blog? • What do you need to know in order to avoid making the same mistakes? • What else is happening out there that you need to be aware of? • What’s going to happen in the immediate blog future? I'm not sure you need a Juris Doctor to answer these questions (and there are prominent PR bloggers who have a J.D.) I'm also fairly sure that a HUGE knock on PRSA and PRCA has been the sloth-like pace they've adopted with regards to blogging. For the PRSA audience, I don't think you could find a more credible group to have a conversation. Your bigger beef - and one that ought be given merit - is "how much should the blogging-bloggers blog about blogging" and whether it provides a measurable ROI for a business case. I don't know that Scott or Kami have ever sunk to Torossian-depths of self-promotion, and Constantin's words on the subject are next-to-silent compared to the behind-the-scenes work he puts in to making social media accessible. Your comment is on to something, but I fear you've picked the wrong example.
Ike,
I am going by the title of the seminar, i.e. Social Media Update: Legal Implications. If indeed the content is lightweight and not necessarily relevant to the title, shame on PRSA at the outset. My beef is that Scott, Kami and Constantin are TOTALLY unqualified to carry a discussion on blogging's legal implications. Period. Actually, their posture has consistently been one of boosterism. Legitimate caution could not be farther from their track record or intentions. As to ROI... no. This is purely about just how much legal risk blogging exposes your organization to. There may be some money to be made by playing on the highway. All it takes is one truck. - Amanda Add Comment
|