Blogosphere Files for DivorceComments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I always advise people to get blogs only as content delivery systems to catch the attention of search engines, and that's all they are TRULY good for. Community? Who needs it? I have enough friends already, thanks.
I get a real kick out of Edelman's "join the conservation" crap... they really just want to "drive the conversation" Thanks Strumpette.... love your site
Put your money where your mouth is Strumpette and get rid of the ability for readers to post comments or win $500 in caption contests.
Like it or not the world is a community and although it sucks, it's really fucking crowded and we certainly don't all get along, we have to share and we have to empathize if our messages are to be responsible. (Springer is not responsible. Springer is porn. And it's not even good porn.) For instance, my neighbor, who is not home right now, has a dog which has not stopped barking for 15 minutes. I want to kick in his door and murder his pet with a baseball bat. Alas, I cannot. I have to share society... even though I want to be selfish and not care. If I didn't share when I didn't want to, or at least give it an effort, society would divorce me.
Craig,
I think you may have missed the point a hair. The article was about the marketing buzzwords du jour "relationships" and "conversation." The point is that neither today is practical or realistic. Most relationships end in divorce. Fences and shotguns make for good neighbors. Love, - Amanda
Hi Strumpette, it's tough to know whether to commit the time and energy into crafting a full response to your article - of course who cares, so is it worth the effort?
Everything costs. Relationship costs. Good relationships are expensive. Great relationships are to die for. There's a price to pay for being in one, for being "alone", for being casual. Relationship is essential for survival. Fleeting moments, ships in the night, that quick in and out provide for continuance, but don't guarantee survival like a strong relationship. Pay the price. Die - or die anyway. Of course it takes 2 - and who can say for sure that the other 1/2 is a full 1? Difficult choices for sure; make the wrong one and your dead again. Motive - what's the point? Why not want a relationship? Can't get out of it what was put in? Small wonder we die. If a relationship is for getting a return it's destined to die. Surely it's for giving from the endless reserves of the wonderful "who am I". What reserves? Nothing left to give? Sapped dry from all the take? Yeah that's tough, and we've all been there. Like I said, it takes 2, and it ain't easy. Lonely & happy - sure why not. go for it! I agree society is on the fall - we're too cheap and paying the price. I agree blogs are soap-bytes. I don't agree relationships have to be so tragic (although I ungraciously "accept" they all too often are). Don't get me wrong. I ain't saying it ain't tough - it is. But have you seen my daughter - she is so beautiful I want to pay. Have you seen my wife? She really makes me work hard (in our relationship) and it costs me - but it's for the good of us all. And I think she's wonderful for it. And I know it's my shortcomings that are more painful for me to face than the cost of relating to my wife and kid! Hope Joel proves to be all the man he was made to be - even if he ends up with some other "Mrs Right" just as long as you get your Knight in Shining armour (with a strong back and a joint in the knee!). Funny huh - I was looking for information on Martin Luther and I found you! All the best, Martin Add Comment
|
There comes a point in ALL relationships where communications is suspended. It's sometimes a temporary thing; but sadly, it's sometimes indefinite. Sometimes there's that deafening silence during a long drive home; and then there's when your attorney insists emphatically that, for your own good, you "refrain from any contact whatsoever."
Okay, I hear ya. "But divorce is down," you say. Let's put that in a little perspective. Generally speaking, committed "relationships" are down.
"Here's what my Internet- fearing editors have failed to understand: I don't want to talk to you; I want to talk at you. A column is not my attempt to engage in a conversation with you. I have more than enough people to converse with."
Thanks to everyone who linked here so far this year. You know who you are, but just in case you’ve forgotten: Richard Bailey refreshed his blogroll, I think. Amanda Chapel gave us a mention in her post about blogosphere manners. Owen Cutajar gav...
Tracked: Feb 03, 03:44