WARNING: Don't Try this at home! As a 127 lb. amateur, I am going attempt to break Gonghong Tang’s 2004 record for the "clean and press." AND... as I will likely tear off a limb or cause a massive brain hemorrhage, I am then going to attempt to stick the landing and turn the whole bloody mess into a recommendation. Our subject today: David Weinberger's new book, Everything Is Miscellaneous: the Power of the New Digital Disorder.
Trust me, I am a little more than trepidacious. Why? Well, according to the press announcement, Miscellaneous:
"Charts the new principles of digital order that are remaking business, education, politics, science, and culture. In his rollicking tour of the rise of ‘miscellaneous,’ he examines why the Dewey decimal system is stretched to the breaking point, how Rand McNally decides what information not to include in a physical map (and why Google Earth is winning that battle), how Staples stores emulate online shopping to increase sales, why your children’s teachers will stop having them memorize facts, and how the shift to digital music stands as the model for the future in virtually every industry. Finally, he shows how by ‘going miscellaneous,’ anyone can reap rewards from the deluge of information in modern work and life. From A to Z, Everything Is Miscellaneous will completely reshape the way you think—and what you know—about the world.”
Yikes. My first and admittedly regrettable reaction was to get caught up in the title. A grueling rumination ensued. I wonder if he considered: Everything is Misplaced: Where are My Car Keys; Everything is Mischiato: Forgetaboutit; Everything is Meaningless: I think I am Gonna Kill Myself; and my personal favorite, Everything is Miasma: Fuck You.
Allow me to recompose myself. Seriously, this book is just not easily summarized. Even the rollicking "From A to Z” totally underestimates it. This is more like from A to #457 to the Zanzabar Platypus, batteries extra. Almost poetically, David’s logical order to his treatise is... well... whacked. Hurts my brain just to think about it (see hemorrhage above). And that's the problem; to examine it properly, one's got to first straighten it out.
Actually, for me—the total anal-retentive-neat-freak and card-carrying minimalist—that exorcise was close to irresistible frankly. I imagine the famous Dr. Nigel Higgenbottom compelled similarly by an almost overwhelming curiosity to treat a new virulent strain on Kalaupapa.
Reader Feedback
Tue, Nov 10, 04:07:04 PM
Anthone who has to delcare that they are "authentic" must presumably take the view that they are perceived as not being "authentic" - something which might be of concern in a PR company
Fri, Jul 31, 10:58:34 AM
Ray Durazo (the founder) sold the company to Dan in 1999. He was not involved in any of this. He (and I) found out about the lawsuit in the LA Times. In addition to embezzling this m [...]
Thu, Jul 02, 01:52:48 PM
Be careful using the word authentic too often. Might later come off as "synthetic authenticity"
Thu, May 07, 10:19:02 AM
Funny that such an article should appear on a blog no? You guys must be from New York.
Wed, May 06, 12:59:37 PM
I don't have a clue about PR. But, couldn't this move to 'authentic' just really be running away from anything 'virtual' at all, like all the other band-wagoners out there that never u [...]
Sun, May 03, 08:42:38 PM
I'm a totally authentic blogger. Edelman is in deep shit.
Mon, Apr 27, 08:40:57 AM
Makes me wonder what have they been doing until now?
Sat, Apr 11, 02:24:56 PM
Wow - I agree with Britton that its incredibly poor positioning. Rick also gives the kind of quote that's supposed to sound hip, clever and yet sincere, but it just comes across s [...]